SEC v. Ripple case referred to judge who ordered release of ‘Hinman Documents’.

SEC v. Ripple case referred to judge who ordered release of 'Hinman Documents'.

The Blockchain Industry Moves Forward: An Update on the SEC v. Ripple Case

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) v. Ripple case continues to make headlines in the blockchain industry. Recently, Judge Analisa Torres of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York filed paperwork on July 17, transferring the case to Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn. This move marks the next phase of the legal proceedings, as the case enters the general pretrial stage.

General Pretrial: Discovery and Potential for Settlement

The general pretrial phase typically involves discovery and provides an opportunity for both parties to raise objections. It is also the stage where settlement negotiations are most likely to occur. Experts believe that the SEC is unlikely to appeal the previous week’s rulings by Judge Torres, which included a partial victory for Ripple.

On July 13, Judge Torres dismissed the allegation that Ripple broke the law by posting its XRP token on public exchanges. This ruling implies that XRP is not a security, a significant development with implications for the broader cryptocurrency market. However, accusations remain that Ripple sold XRP as a security directly to investors through a marketing scheme.

Judge Sarah Netburn: Overseeing the Case

Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn will oversee the ensuing phase of the SEC v. Ripple case. Judge Netburn has been involved in the case from its inception and has already weighed in on several previous motions. Notably, she ordered the release of the “Hinman documents,” a collection of SEC files that included a speech by former SEC Director William Hinman in 2018. These documents were highly anticipated and were expected to provide crucial insights into the SEC’s stance on cryptocurrencies.

While the impact of the released documents may not have been as significant as initially hoped by the cryptocurrency community, Ripple’s partial victory in the case has already had a profound effect on overall market sentiment. Judge Netburn’s history of challenging the SEC’s assertions in the case adds to the positive sentiment surrounding Ripple.

The Ripple Effect: Implications for the Crypto Market

The SEC v. Ripple case has broader implications for the cryptocurrency market. The ruling that XRP is not a security has provided clarity and may pave the way for other cryptocurrencies to avoid being classified as securities. This development is crucial as it removes regulatory uncertainty and allows for more innovation in the blockchain industry.

Since the July 13 ruling, XRP’s price has experienced significant fluctuations. At the time of publication, XRP is trading at $0.72, a decrease from its peak but still up over 56% since the ruling. This demonstrates the market’s positive response to the favorable outcome for Ripple.


The SEC v. Ripple case is a highly watched legal battle within the blockchain industry. The recent transfer of the case to Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn signals the beginning of the general pretrial phase, where settlement negotiations are likely to take place. Judge Netburn’s involvement and history of challenging the SEC’s assertions add to the optimistic sentiment surrounding Ripple.

The ruling that XRP is not a security has significant implications for the broader cryptocurrency market, providing clarity and room for innovation. While the case continues to unfold, it remains a critical event that shapes the future regulatory landscape for blockchain technology.